Information

We use cookies to personalize content and ads and to analyze our traffic.
We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners. See details.

We use cookies to personalize content, ads, analyze traffic and share information about your use of our site. See details.

Home
|
|
|
Events
|
Press Releases
|
Subscribe
Type
Thought Leadership
Product Insight
Subscribe
Market and Economics
Portfolio and Risk Analysis
Companies and Earnings
Shareholder Distributions
ETFs
Fixed Income
Hedge Funds
M&A and Corporate Activism
Market Summaries
Category
Fact Sheets
Tools and Tips
Webcasts
White Papers

Activist Influence at U.S. Corporations Continues to Rise in 2015

By John Laide, Senior Product Manager
Jun 9, 2015

An early look at proxy fight statistics for the 2015 proxy season, along with the high profile management victory at E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, would on the surface provide the impression that companies may have turned the corner against ever increasing activist success. However, a deeper dive into the data shows that activist influence at U.S. corporations continues to rise.

As of June 5, 2015, the company win rate for board seat proxy contests that went to a shareholder vote stands at approximately 62%. That represents a 57% increase over 2014's win rate of only 39%. Additionally, support for activist candidates has declined this year. Of the proxy contests that went to a shareholder vote where vote results have been disclosed, activist candidates have on average received support from approximately 33% of the votes outstanding. Activist candidates were supported by an average of 42% of the outstanding votes in 2014.

Of course, proxy fight votes don't tell the full story. Settlements continue to rise. The 33 proxy fights that have been formally settled (or were withdrawn after the company made material concessions) as of June 5, 2015 is the most at this point in any year since FactSet began tracking proxy fights in 2001. More importantly, many companies are choosing to grant activists board seats, often as part of a standstill agreement, before letting an activist situation escalate into a proxy fight. Forty-six non-proxy fight activist campaigns have resulted in a board seat as of June 1, 2015, the most in any comparable period according to FactSet data. In comparison, 34 and 11 such campaigns resulted in board seats in the same period in 2014 and 2013 respectively. The data, which is based on the announcement date that the seat was granted, includes all campaigns where activist investors attained board seats directly or had a material say in the appointment of new independent director(s), that were granted as part of an activist campaign or to prominent activists that were schedule 13D filers but had not publicly agitated at the company.

Among the 2015 non-proxy fight campaigns which resulted in board seats were situations involving prominent activists Elliott Management Corporation at EMC Corporation and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., Starboard Value LP at Staples, Inc., Pershing Square Capital Management LP at Zoetis Inc., Icahn Associates at The Manitowoc Company, Inc., and Trian Fund Management, L.P. at PepsiCo, Inc.

Receive stories like this to your inbox as they are published. Subscribe by e-mail and follow @FactSet on Twitter. If you are looking to source FactSet data or analytics in your publication, email media_request@factset.com.

© Copyright 2000 - FactSet Research Systems Inc.