日本語サイト
Connect with FactSet :    BLOG | CAREERS | EVENTS | ✉ EMAIL NEWSLETTERS | REQUEST A FREE TRIAL        +1.877.FACTSET
FactSet Insider: From news to know how
Thought Leadership
Webcasts
Podcasts
Discourse and Opinion
Product Insight
Efficient Ideas
Product Tours
Fact Sheets
Events
Press Releases
Connect with FactSet
Subscribe to Updates
Follow us on Twitter
Download Podcasts
Watch us on YouTube
Home FactSet Insight Thought Leadership Discourse and Opinion How did U.S. public M&A deals fare in 2010?

How did U.S. public M&A deals fare in 2010?


28 Feb 2011

Bookmark and Share

FactSet’s Michael Benkert, Research Manager, FactSet Mergers, explores the recovery and trends of the U.S. public M&A market.

The financial markets have been anticipating an M&A comeback in the aftermath of the 2007 credit crunch for some time. On one hand, the stock markets have come roaring back since the financial tumult of September 2008, with a recent close on the Dow Industrials of more than 12,000 points in early 2011. On the other hand, the M&A market had survived the post-credit crunch period, possibly on a starvation diet if you will. Mega-merger deals still continued, but obviously not at the same pace as years past. While the stock markets have been building momentum toward a comeback, what can be said about any recovery in the U.S. public M&A market in 2010?     
 

Average deal sizes of friendly U.S. public deals were fairly stable between 2008 and 2009, with an average transaction value of $1.54 billion in 2008 and $1.61 billion in 2009. Strategic buyer deals recorded an average value of $1.73 billion in 2008 and nearly $1.9b in 2009. And while the general trend in deal value for financial buyer deals also remained steady between 2008 and 2009, the average value was significantly lower at $304 million in 2008 and $292 million in 2009.  

The results for 2010, however, reflect a near convergence of average deal value for both strategic and financial buyers. The average strategic deal size decreased to less than $1.1 billion from the $1.9 billion in 2009. Conversely, the average financial buyer deal size made a striking comeback with an increase to $762 million from $293 million in 2009. What forces could be driving the respective value trends for strategic and financial buyers? Is it permissible to believe that there was a moderate recovery during 2010 as deal-making picked up, but the M&A activity of financial and strategic buyers went in different directions? 

In 2008, strategic buyer deals valued over $500 million had outnumbered their financial buyer counterparts by a margin of 11 to 1, or 56 strategic deals versus 5 financial deals. The year 2009 revealed that the volume trend of deals valued over $500 million fell to 44 strategic deals and 3 financial deals, culminating in a margin of nearly 1 financial buyer deal for every 15 strategic deals. However, in 2010, the transaction value quality of financial buyers closed the gap against strategic buyers by presenting 21 transactions valued over $500 million each versus 72 strategic buyer deals over that value, or a ratio of only 3.5 strategic to financial buyer deals in that year. The chart below suggests that the markets for deals valued over $500 million were picking up across the board, but financial buyer deals were gaining traction at a greater rate in 2010. Time will tell if this deal trend continues into 2011 with any general continual recovery of the U.S. economy.  

Note: The data used in this research were based on U.S. targets only and deals with a merger agreement filed.

Image source: FactSet MergerMetrics, http://www.factset.com/mergers

 


Comments